Texas · TX
IVF success rates in Texas
Texas has 44 CDC-reporting fertility clinics in 20 cities. Houston has the most with 8. Together they reported 33,825 ART cycles and 7,641 live-birth deliveries to the CDC for 2022.
The table below lists every clinic alphabetically with its CDC live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval in three age bands and the number of retrievals behind each rate. It is not a ranking: small samples and different patient populations make direct comparison unreliable. Open a clinic for all age bands, donor-egg rates and the national benchmark.
44
clinics
20
cities
33,825
ART cycles
7,641
live-birth deliveries
CDC 2022 success rates for clinics in Texas
| Clinic | City | Live births per intended retrieval, under 35 (2022; of intended retrievals) | 35–37 | 38–40 | New patients under 35, all retrievals | Total cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Fertility Center of Texas | Houston | 44.1% of 68 retrievals | 36.1% of 36 | 25.9% of 27 | 56.5% | 343 |
| Advanced Fertility Centers, PLLC small sample | Odessa | 12 of 18 | — | — | 11 of 17 | 44 |
| Aspire Fertility-Austin | Austin | 54.7% of 95 retrievals | 40.9% of 88 | 26.8% of 71 | 64.9% | 856 |
| Aspire Fertility-Dallas | Addison | 42.1% of 126 retrievals | 29.7% of 74 | 30.9% of 55 | 49.5% | 818 |
| Aspire Fertility-San Antonio | San Antonio | 52.1% of 263 retrievals | 38.5% of 135 | 27.5% of 153 | 61.5% | 1,482 |
| Austin Fertility and Reproductive Medicine-Westlake IVF | Austin | 53.5% of 71 retrievals | 20.8% of 48 | 23.1% of 39 | 58.6% | 449 |
| Austin Fertility Institute, PA | Austin | 43.8% of 73 retrievals | 36.4% of 44 | 32.4% of 37 | 51.9% | 435 |
| Brooke Army Medical Center | Fort Sam Houston | 44.8% of 58 retrievals | 51.7% of 29 | 34.6% of 26 | 48.8% | 166 |
| CCRM Dallas-Fort Worth | Frisco | 50% of 58 retrievals | 19.4% of 36 | 16.7% of 42 | 61.4% | 394 |
| Center for Assisted Reproduction | Bedford | 60% of 195 retrievals | 36.8% of 95 | 26.3% of 76 | 64.7% | 1,140 |
| Center of Reproductive Medicine, LLP dba, SGF Houston | Webster | 50% of 216 retrievals | 33% of 115 | 15.5% of 97 | 58.8% | 1,171 |
| Conceive Fertility Center | Dallas | 44.2% of 77 retrievals | 38.1% of 42 | 8.6% of 35 | 49.2% | 624 |
| Cooper Institute for Advanced Reproductive Medicine | Houston | 28.6% of 21 retrievals | — | — | 5 of 18 | 128 |
| Dallas IVF | Frisco | 53.4% of 290 retrievals | 41.3% of 126 | 18.7% of 139 | 57.7% | 1,487 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth Fertility Associates | Dallas | 54.9% of 324 retrievals | 40.6% of 239 | 25.1% of 223 | 67.8% | 2,424 |
| DFW Center for Fertility & IVF | Allen | 65.5% of 29 retrievals | 7 of 17 | 25% of 20 | 70.8% | 193 |
| Family Fertility Center | Houston | 39.2% of 102 retrievals | 30.4% of 79 | 14.9% of 67 | 45.5% | 578 |
| Fertility and Advanced Reproductive Medicine | Dallas | 33.3% of 33 retrievals | 21.6% of 37 | 11.8% of 34 | 10 of 18 | 314 |
| Fertility Center of Dallas | Dallas | 52.1% of 48 retrievals | 42.9% of 42 | 35.7% of 28 | 63.2% | 328 |
| Fertility Center of San Antonio | San Antonio | 53.4% of 131 retrievals | 43.3% of 60 | 31.3% of 64 | 60.8% | 639 |
| Fertility Specialists of Texas-Lubbock | Lubbock | 50% of 28 retrievals | — | — | 12 of 19 | 97 |
| Fertility Specialists of Texas, PLLC | Plano | 59% of 305 retrievals | 46.8% of 154 | 21.4% of 154 | 67.2% | 2,119 |
| Fora Fertility, PLLC | Austin | 52.1% of 96 retrievals | 23.9% of 67 | 14.8% of 61 | 67.2% | 709 |
| HART Fertility Clinic | The Woodlands | 52.7% of 55 retrievals | 29.7% of 37 | 17.6% of 34 | 57.4% | 425 |
| Houston Fertility Institute | Houston | 60.9% of 900 retrievals | 42.3% of 494 | 31% of 500 | 71.2% | 6,850 |
| Houston Infertility Clinic, Sonja Kristiansen, MD | Houston | 12.4% of 105 retrievals | 11.1% of 36 | 22.7% of 44 | 13.8% | 242 |
| Houston IVF dba, CCRM Houston | Houston | 60.5% of 263 retrievals | 44.3% of 221 | 34.3% of 198 | 72% | 2,157 |
| Inovi Fertility & Genetics Institute | Houston | 45% of 20 retrievals | — | — | 9 of 16 | 165 |
| IVFMD-Arlington | Arlington | 57.6% of 66 retrievals | 43.9% of 41 | 29.2% of 24 | 58.5% | 287 |
| IVFMD-Irving | Irving | 57.3% of 117 retrievals | 43.8% of 80 | 22% of 41 | 59.6% | 685 |
| Kindbody - Houston | Houston | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 9 |
| Kindbody Austin | Austin | — | — | — | — | 262 |
| Origin Fertility, PA | Grapevine | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 43 |
| Pozitivf Fertility | San Antonio | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | No cycles reported | 79 |
| Reproductive Institute of South Texas | McAllen | 40.9% of 22 retrievals | — | 9.1% of 22 | 45% | 91 |
| ReproMed Fertility Center | Dallas | 40.4% of 57 retrievals | 42.3% of 26 | 18.4% of 38 | 52.4% | 289 |
| Scott & White Clinic-Temple | Temple | 48.2% of 85 retrievals | 30.3% of 33 | 18.5% of 27 | 47.6% | 244 |
| Southwest Center for Reproductive Health, PA small sample | El Paso | 5 of 14 | — | — | — | 90 |
| Texas Center for Reproductive Health small sample | Dallas | 10 of 19 | — | 0 of 10 | 10 of 13 | 55 |
| Texas Fertility Center, Vaughn, Silverberg & Associates | Austin | 55.5% of 402 retrievals | 39.7% of 267 | 20.4% of 270 | 67% | 3,391 |
| Texas IVF | Plano | 44.8% of 29 retrievals | 19% of 21 | 20.8% of 24 | 7 of 19 | 194 |
| Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Center for Fertility and Reproductive Surgery | Lubbock | 44.1% of 34 retrievals | 7 of 16 | — | 50% | 171 |
| The Center for Reproductive Endocrinology | Dallas | 41.8% of 98 retrievals | 43.8% of 32 | 26% of 50 | 47.9% | 690 |
| UT Health San Antonio Reproductive Health and Fertility Center | San Antonio | 51.1% of 88 retrievals | 32.8% of 58 | 23.7% of 59 | 60.9% | 468 |
| US average (CDC national) | 49.7% | 36.3% | 23.1% | 60.8% |
Listed alphabetically, not ranked. Each rate is the CDC-reported percentage of intended egg retrievals that resulted in a live-birth delivery for patients using their own eggs (2022), with the number of intended retrievals behind it. 3 clinics are marked “small sample”: the under-35 figure rests on fewer than 20 intended retrievals, so the CDC prints it as a fraction.
Why these numbers do not rank clinics. The CDC says that “comparisons between clinics should be made with caution. Clinics may have different rates because they have different patient populations or ART treatment methods.” Small samples swing widely: the CDC notes that if a clinic reports only one ART cycle in a given category, its success rate in that category “would be either 0% or 100%.” Clinics also treat different patients (age within a band, diagnoses, how many patients with a poor prognosis they accept), and those differences move a rate as much as the care does. Use the table to see who reports what, and on how many cycles, then ask each clinic about patients like you. Source: CDC, How to Interpret ART Success Rates.
Cities in Texas
- Houston 8
- Dallas 7
- Austin 6
- San Antonio 4
- Frisco 2
- Lubbock 2
- Plano 2
- Addison 1
- Allen 1
- Arlington 1
- Bedford 1
- El Paso 1
- Fort Sam Houston 1
- Grapevine 1
- Irving 1
- McAllen 1
- Odessa 1
- Temple 1
- The Woodlands 1
- Webster 1
No city matches. Every clinic is in the table above.
Cities with fewer than 5 clinics have no page of their own; their clinics are in the table above.
Tools and guides
- Success rate lookup - pick a clinic and an age band to see its live-birth rates with the number of cycles behind them.
- How to read CDC success rates - what each row in the clinic report measures and why the denominators matter.
- Questions to ask about costs - a checklist for the finance consult: what a cycle quote covers and what it leaves out.
Frequently asked questions
How many fertility clinics in Texas report to the CDC?
44 clinics in Texas reported 2022 ART cycles to the CDC National ART Surveillance System, across 20 cities. Clinics that did not report are listed without data.
Are the clinics ranked?
No. They are listed alphabetically, each with its CDC-reported live-birth rate per intended egg retrieval and the number of retrievals behind it. The CDC itself says that comparisons between clinics should be made with caution, because clinics have different patient populations and treatment methods, and a rate based on a few dozen cycles can swing widely. Clinics whose CDC figure is a fraction (fewer than 20 intended retrievals) are marked as small samples.
Does a higher rate mean a better clinic?
No. The CDC cautions that average chances may not reflect an individual's outcome, and clinics treat different patient populations: age mix, diagnoses and how many patients are turned away all move the rate. Use the figures as a starting point for questions, not as a verdict.