Fertility clinic

CCRM Dallas-Fort Worth

8380 Warren Pkwy, Suite 201, Frisco, TX 75034

CCRM Dallas-Fort Worth reported 394 ART cycles to the CDC for 2022, close to the median of 369 cycles among the 44 CDC-reporting clinics in Texas. For patients using their own eggs, the CDC published a percentage for patients under 35, 35–37, 38–40 and over 40. The CDC lists donor eggs, embryo cryopreservation, egg cryopreservation and gestational carrier among its services. It is a SART member (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology).

CDC 2022 · live births per intended egg retrieval · patients under 35, own eggs

50%based on 58 intended retrievalsUS average 49.7%

Clinic details

Address8380 Warren Pkwy, Suite 201, Frisco, TX 75034
Phone972-377-2625
Medical directorDorette J. Noorhasan, MD
CDC clinic statusOpen
SART memberYes
Lab accreditation verified by CDCYes
CDC clinic ID427
CDC dataCDC data released Dec 18, 2024; fetched Oct 22, 2026

CDC report verified by Dorette J. Noorhasan, MD.

Services

  • Donor eggs
  • Embryo cryopreservation
  • Egg cryopreservation
  • Gestational carrier

Services are the five the CDC asks every clinic to report. Clinics offer more; ask directly.

Total ART cycles (2022)394
Fertility preservation cycles (2022)61
Pregnancies (2022)81
Live-birth deliveries (2022)74
Infants born (2022)75

Success rates by age (2022)

Patients using their own eggs, grouped by the CDC's four age bands. Each cell is the clinic's CDC-reported figure; the smaller “US” line is the national figure for the same cell.

Patients using their own eggs, by age
Measure Under 3535–3738–40Over 40
All patients using their own eggs
Live births per intended egg retrieval 50% US 49.7% 19.4% US 36.3% 16.7% US 23.1% 18.5% US 7.7%
Singleton live births per intended egg retrieval 50% US 46.7% 16.7% US 34.5% 14.3% US 22% 18.5% US 7.5%
Live births per actual egg retrieval 51.8% US 52.6% 24.1% US 39.7% 18.4% US 26.1% 21.7% US 9.4%
Live births per transfer 61.7% US 49.1% 7 of 13 US 46% 7 of 17 US 41.2% 5 of 6 US 25.4%
Singleton live births per transfer 61.7% US 46.2% 6 of 13 US 43.7% 6 of 17 US 39.2% 5 of 6 US 24.5%
Average transfers per intended egg retrieval 0.8 US 1 0.4 US 0.8 0.4 US 0.6 0.2 US 0.3
Average intended egg retrievals per live birth 2 US 2 5.1 US 2.8 6 US 4.3 5.4 US 12.9
New patients (no prior ART) using their own eggs: cumulative outcomes
New patients: live birth after 1 intended retrieval 61.4% US 53.4% 6 of 14 US 39.9% 9.5% US 25.4% —
New patients: live birth after 1 or 2 intended retrievals 61.4% US 59.6% 6 of 14 US 47.6% 19% US 32.7% —
New patients: live birth after all intended retrievals 61.4% US 60.8% 6 of 14 US 49.9% 19% US 35.2% —
New patients: average intended retrievals per patient 1.1 US 1.2 1.1 US 1.3 1.4 US 1.4 1.2 US 1.6
Number of cycles behind the rates (2022)
Intended egg retrievals 58 36 42 27
Egg retrievals 56 29 38 23
Transfers 47 13 17 6

“US” is the CDC national figure for the same measure and group. “—”: the CDC published no value. Its asterisk (*) means a reported sample size of 1 through 4, suppressed for privacy, along with any value that could be used to derive it. A value such as “9 of 15” is the CDC's own fraction: the CDC uses fractions for rates with denominators less than 20. It is not converted to a percentage.

Cycle characteristics (2022)

Context for the rates: how often cycles stopped early, and how much of the clinic's practice is frozen transfer, ICSI, PGT, fertility preservation and gestational carriers.

Share of cycles and transfers, by age
Measure Under 3535–3738–40Over 40All ages
Intended retrievals with no eggs retrieved 1.8% 4.3% 5.5% 15.9% 5.5%
Cycles stopped after retrieval, before transfer or banking 6.2% 4.8% 9.9% 9.3% 7.1%
Cycles for fertility preservation 15.2% 10.6% 21.4% 14.8% 15.5%
Transfers using a gestational carrier 0% 0% 0% — 0%
Transfers using frozen embryos 100% 94.9% 96.6% — 97.8%
Transfers with ICSI 92.3% 87.2% 86.2% — 87.6%
Transfers with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) 94.2% 79.5% 82.8% — 87.6%

“—”: the CDC published no value. Its asterisk (*) means a reported sample size of 1 through 4, suppressed for privacy, along with any value that could be used to derive it.

Reasons patients used ART (2022)

Diagnoses as reported to the CDC; a cycle can have more than one, so the shares add to more than 100%. This is the patient mix behind the rates above.

  • Male factor26%
  • Endometriosis3%
  • Tubal factor17%
  • Ovulatory dysfunction12%
  • Uterine factor6%
  • Preimplantation genetic testing4%
  • Diminished ovarian reserve16%
  • Egg or embryo banking57%
  • Recurrent pregnancy loss11%
  • Other factor, infertility23%
  • Other factor, non-infertility5%
  • Unexplained factor6%

What the measures mean

Intended egg retrieval
A cycle started “with the plan to retrieve eggs”, counted whether or not any eggs were retrieved, so cancelled cycles stay in the denominator. Rates per intended retrieval are cumulative: they count live births from every embryo transfer within 1 year after that retrieval, fresh or frozen.
Egg retrieval (actual)
“A procedure to collect the eggs contained in the ovarian follicles.” Rates per actual retrieval are cumulative in the same way but leave out cycles cancelled before retrieval, so they are never lower than the rate per intended retrieval.
Transfer
“Placement of embryos into a woman's uterus through the cervix after IVF.” A rate per transfer counts each transfer on its own, so cycles that never reached a transfer are not in it. It is not always the highest rate: in 2022 the US figure for patients under 35 was 49.1% per transfer against 49.7% per intended retrieval. In the older bands, where many cycles never reach a transfer, it is usually higher (over 40: 25.4% per transfer, 7.7% per intended retrieval).
Live-birth delivery
“The delivery of one or more infants with at least one born alive.” A singleton live-birth delivery is “the delivery of a single infant born alive.”
New patients: cumulative outcomes
Patients with no prior ART, followed through one, two, or all of their intended retrievals, counting transfers of fresh or frozen embryos from those retrievals. This is the closest the report comes to “my chance of a baby from starting treatment”.
Age bands
The CDC groups patients using their own eggs as under 35, 35 to 37, 38 to 40, and over 40, because egg quality falls with the patient's age. Donor-egg rates are not split by age: the donor's age drives them, not the patient's.

Definitions follow the CDC ART glossary and the CDC's guide to interpreting success rates; see the guide to reading the report for worked examples.

Suggest a correction

Moved, renamed, closed, or a phone number that no longer answers? Tell us and we will check it. Work at CCRM Dallas-Fort Worth? Use the same form to claim the page. Success-rate figures cannot be changed here: they come from the CDC report.

Suggest a correction for CCRM Dallas-Fort Worth

Nearby clinics

Fertility clinic

Dallas IVF

Frisco, TX · 1.6 mi away

Under 35
53.4% (290 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval
Fertility clinic

Texas IVF

Plano, TX · 4.7 mi away

Under 35
44.8% (29 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval
Fertility clinic

Aspire Fertility-Dallas

Addison, TX · 9.5 mi away

Under 35
42.1% (126 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval

More clinics in Texas

Sources: data.cdc.gov (clinic record, phone, services and clinic profile; fetched Oct 22, 2026) ; data.cdc.gov (clinic profile, cycle counts and cycle characteristics; fetched Oct 22, 2026) ; data.cdc.gov (success rates; fetched Oct 22, 2026) . CDC data released Dec 18, 2024; fetched Oct 22, 2026. Contact details are as the clinic reported them to the CDC for 2022; they were not re-checked with the clinic.