STL Fertility
St. Louis, MO · 0.5 mi away
- Under 35
- 48.8% (80 retrievals) live births per intended retrieval
844 N. New Ballas Ct, Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63141
Center for Reproductive Medicine & Robotic Surgery reported 64 ART cycles to the CDC for 2022, below the median of 733 cycles among the 9 CDC-reporting clinics in Missouri. For patients using their own eggs, the CDC published fractions for patients under 35 and 38–40 (fewer than 20 intended retrievals); 2 bands have no published rate. The CDC lists donor eggs, donated embryos, embryo cryopreservation, egg cryopreservation and gestational carrier among its services. It is not listed as a SART member.
CDC 2022 · live births per intended egg retrieval · patients under 35, own eggs
7 of 17
Last reviewed: Dec 18, 2024, the date of the CDC record these figures come from. Source: CDC National ART Surveillance System (NASS), 2022 Final data, released December 18, 2024. See the CDC's guide to interpreting ART success rates.
| Address | 844 N. New Ballas Ct, Suite 300, St. Louis, MO 63141 |
|---|---|
| Phone | 314-473-1285 |
| Medical director | Saji Jacob, MD |
| CDC clinic status | Open |
| SART member | No |
| Lab accreditation verified by CDC | Yes |
| CDC clinic ID | 187 |
| CDC data | CDC data released Dec 18, 2024; fetched Oct 22, 2026 |
CDC report verified by Saji Jacob, MD.
Services are the five the CDC asks every clinic to report. Clinics offer more; ask directly.
| Total ART cycles (2022) | 64 |
|---|---|
| Fertility preservation cycles (2022) | 8 |
| Pregnancies (2022) | 21 |
| Live-birth deliveries (2022) | 17 |
| Infants born (2022) | 20 |
Patients using their own eggs, grouped by the CDC's four age bands. Each cell is the clinic's CDC-reported figure; the smaller “US” line is the national figure for the same cell.
| Measure | Under 35 | 35–37 | 38–40 | Over 40 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients using their own eggs | ||||
| Live births per intended egg retrieval | 7 of 17 US 49.7% | — | 0 of 8 US 23.1% | — |
| Singleton live births per intended egg retrieval | 6 of 17 US 46.7% | — | 0 of 8 US 22% | — |
| Live births per actual egg retrieval | 7 of 16 US 52.6% | — | 0 of 8 US 26.1% | No cycles reported |
| Live births per transfer | 7 of 15 US 49.1% | — | 0 of 5 US 41.2% | No cycles reported |
| Singleton live births per transfer | 6 of 15 US 46.2% | — | 0 of 5 US 39.2% | No cycles reported |
| Average transfers per intended egg retrieval | 0.9 US 1 | 0.7 US 0.8 | 0.6 US 0.6 | 0 US 0.3 |
| Average intended egg retrievals per live birth | 2.4 US 2 | 6 US 2.8 | No live births reported | No live births reported |
| New patients (no prior ART) using their own eggs: cumulative outcomes | ||||
| New patients: live birth after 1 intended retrieval | — | — | — | — |
| New patients: live birth after 1 or 2 intended retrievals | 5 of 11 US 59.6% | — | — | — |
| New patients: live birth after all intended retrievals | 5 of 11 US 60.8% | — | — | — |
| New patients: average intended retrievals per patient | 1.4 US 1.2 | 1.3 US 1.3 | 2.5 US 1.4 | 1 US 1.6 |
| Number of cycles behind the rates (2022) | ||||
| Intended egg retrievals | 17 | 6 | 8 | — |
| Egg retrievals | 16 | 6 | 8 | 0 |
| Transfers | 15 | — | 5 | 0 |
“US” is the CDC national figure for the same measure and group. “—”: the CDC published no value. Its asterisk (*) means a reported sample size of 1 through 4, suppressed for privacy, along with any value that could be used to derive it. “No cycles reported”: the CDC reported no cycles meeting this criterion. It prints 0.0 there with that footnote; it is not a 0% success rate and is not compared with the US figure. “No live births reported”: the clinic reported no live births in that group, so an average number of retrievals per live birth cannot be calculated (the CDC file shows 0). A value such as “9 of 15” is the CDC's own fraction: the CDC uses fractions for rates with denominators less than 20. It is not converted to a percentage.
Context for the rates: how often cycles stopped early, and how much of the clinic's practice is frozen transfer, ICSI, PGT, fertility preservation and gestational carriers.
| Measure | Under 35 | 35–37 | 38–40 | Over 40 | All ages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intended retrievals with no eggs retrieved | — | — | — | — | 6.1% |
| Cycles stopped after retrieval, before transfer or banking | 3.3% | — | — | — | 3.2% |
| Cycles for fertility preservation | 15.6% | — | — | — | 12.5% |
| Transfers using a gestational carrier | — | — | — | — | 0% |
| Transfers using frozen embryos | — | — | — | — | 93.5% |
| Transfers with ICSI | — | — | — | — | 96.8% |
| Transfers with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) | — | — | — | — | 54.8% |
“—”: the CDC published no value. Its asterisk (*) means a reported sample size of 1 through 4, suppressed for privacy, along with any value that could be used to derive it.
Diagnoses as reported to the CDC; a cycle can have more than one, so the shares add to more than 100%. This is the patient mix behind the rates above.
Definitions follow the CDC ART glossary and the CDC's guide to interpreting success rates; see the guide to reading the report for worked examples.
Moved, renamed, closed, or a phone number that no longer answers? Tell us and we will check it. Work at Center for Reproductive Medicine & Robotic Surgery? Use the same form to claim the page. Success-rate figures cannot be changed here: they come from the CDC report.
Suggest a correction for Center for Reproductive Medicine & Robotic Surgery
St. Louis, MO · 0.5 mi away
Chesterfield, MO · 3.5 mi away
Chesterfield, MO · 8.4 mi away
St. Louis, MO · 10.4 mi away
Saint Peters, MO · 11.8 mi away
Sources: data.cdc.gov (clinic record, phone, services and clinic profile; fetched Oct 22, 2026) ; data.cdc.gov (clinic profile, cycle counts and cycle characteristics; fetched Oct 22, 2026) ; data.cdc.gov (success rates; fetched Oct 22, 2026) . CDC data released Dec 18, 2024; fetched Oct 22, 2026. Contact details are as the clinic reported them to the CDC for 2022; they were not re-checked with the clinic.